On the Comparison of Timoshenko and Shear Models in Beam DynamicsSource: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 010Author:Noël Challamel
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:10(1141)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The classical Timoshenko beam model and the shear beam model are often used to model shear building behavior both for stability or dynamic analysis. This technical note questions the theoretical relationship between both models for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. The simply supported beam is analytically studied for both models. Asymptotic solutions are obtained for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. In the general case, it is proven that the shear beam model cannot be deduced from the Timoshenko model, by considering large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. This is only achieved for specific geometrical parameter in the present example. As a conclusion, the capability of the shear model to approximate Timoshenko model for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter is firmly dependent on the material and geometrical characteristics of the beam section and on the boundary conditions.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Noël Challamel | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:40:46Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T22:40:46Z | |
date copyright | October 2006 | |
date issued | 2006 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9399%282006%29132%3A10%281141%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/86172 | |
description abstract | The classical Timoshenko beam model and the shear beam model are often used to model shear building behavior both for stability or dynamic analysis. This technical note questions the theoretical relationship between both models for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. The simply supported beam is analytically studied for both models. Asymptotic solutions are obtained for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. In the general case, it is proven that the shear beam model cannot be deduced from the Timoshenko model, by considering large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. This is only achieved for specific geometrical parameter in the present example. As a conclusion, the capability of the shear model to approximate Timoshenko model for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter is firmly dependent on the material and geometrical characteristics of the beam section and on the boundary conditions. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | On the Comparison of Timoshenko and Shear Models in Beam Dynamics | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 132 | |
journal issue | 10 | |
journal title | Journal of Engineering Mechanics | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:10(1141) | |
tree | Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 010 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |