Show simple item record

contributor authorNoël Challamel
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:40:46Z
date available2017-05-08T22:40:46Z
date copyrightOctober 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%282006%29132%3A10%281141%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/86172
description abstractThe classical Timoshenko beam model and the shear beam model are often used to model shear building behavior both for stability or dynamic analysis. This technical note questions the theoretical relationship between both models for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. The simply supported beam is analytically studied for both models. Asymptotic solutions are obtained for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. In the general case, it is proven that the shear beam model cannot be deduced from the Timoshenko model, by considering large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter. This is only achieved for specific geometrical parameter in the present example. As a conclusion, the capability of the shear model to approximate Timoshenko model for large values of bending to shear stiffness parameter is firmly dependent on the material and geometrical characteristics of the beam section and on the boundary conditions.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleOn the Comparison of Timoshenko and Shear Models in Beam Dynamics
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:10(1141)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record