Window Analyses of Compensable DelaysSource: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 002Author:Michael R. Finke
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:2(96)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The identification and analysis of compensable delays become necessary on most construction projects. Although there are several different analytical techniques available, the window method of contemporaneously analyzing delays is the most realistic. The reasons for the superiority of the window method are discussed. The possible results of a window analysis are evaluated and graphically presented. Also discussed are a correction, or intermediate step, in the method, necessary to avoid incorrect findings of false concurrency, and the proper method for handling apportionable and nonapportionable delays. Finally, an argument is made that the burden of proving noncompensable delays, assuming a proper window analysis of compensable delays by a contractor, should be borne by the owner.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Michael R. Finke | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:39:53Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T22:39:53Z | |
| date copyright | March 1999 | |
| date issued | 1999 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9364%281999%29125%3A2%2896%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/85600 | |
| description abstract | The identification and analysis of compensable delays become necessary on most construction projects. Although there are several different analytical techniques available, the window method of contemporaneously analyzing delays is the most realistic. The reasons for the superiority of the window method are discussed. The possible results of a window analysis are evaluated and graphically presented. Also discussed are a correction, or intermediate step, in the method, necessary to avoid incorrect findings of false concurrency, and the proper method for handling apportionable and nonapportionable delays. Finally, an argument is made that the burden of proving noncompensable delays, assuming a proper window analysis of compensable delays by a contractor, should be borne by the owner. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Window Analyses of Compensable Delays | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 125 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:2(96) | |
| tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |