YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Stability of Built‐up Columns

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Atle Gjelsvik
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:6(1331)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The buckling of columns with finite shear stiffness such as built‐up and laced columns is investigated. The methods of analysis associated with Engesser and Haringx are compared. The difference between the methods can be traced to the direction of the axial force and the shear force used in the analysis. It is concluded that when the usual shear stiffness of the column is used, the Engesser method is the correct one for columns modeled as continuous Timoshenko shear beams. The appropriate method to use for helical springs is not investigated. The effect of the shear stiffness on the column buckling load for the usual standard boundary conditions is also presented analytically, and in the form of graphs.
    • Download: (654.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Stability of Built‐up Columns

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/83510
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAtle Gjelsvik
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:36:19Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:36:19Z
    date copyrightJune 1991
    date issued1991
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281991%29117%3A6%281331%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/83510
    description abstractThe buckling of columns with finite shear stiffness such as built‐up and laced columns is investigated. The methods of analysis associated with Engesser and Haringx are compared. The difference between the methods can be traced to the direction of the axial force and the shear force used in the analysis. It is concluded that when the usual shear stiffness of the column is used, the Engesser method is the correct one for columns modeled as continuous Timoshenko shear beams. The appropriate method to use for helical springs is not investigated. The effect of the shear stiffness on the column buckling load for the usual standard boundary conditions is also presented analytically, and in the form of graphs.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleStability of Built‐up Columns
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume117
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:6(1331)
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian