Show simple item record

contributor authorAtle Gjelsvik
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:36:19Z
date available2017-05-08T22:36:19Z
date copyrightJune 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281991%29117%3A6%281331%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/83510
description abstractThe buckling of columns with finite shear stiffness such as built‐up and laced columns is investigated. The methods of analysis associated with Engesser and Haringx are compared. The difference between the methods can be traced to the direction of the axial force and the shear force used in the analysis. It is concluded that when the usual shear stiffness of the column is used, the Engesser method is the correct one for columns modeled as continuous Timoshenko shear beams. The appropriate method to use for helical springs is not investigated. The effect of the shear stiffness on the column buckling load for the usual standard boundary conditions is also presented analytically, and in the form of graphs.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleStability of Built‐up Columns
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:6(1331)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record