| contributor author | Alex Albert | |
| contributor author | Matthew R. Hallowell | |
| contributor author | Helen Lingard | |
| contributor author | Brian M. Kleiner | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:22:26Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T22:22:26Z | |
| date copyright | July 2015 | |
| date issued | 2015 | |
| identifier other | 43575529.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/78974 | |
| description abstract | Identifying and evaluating solutions for critical industry challenges is a major theme of construction engineering and management (CEM) research. Researchers and practitioners in the construction sector often seek to invent, test, implement, and disseminate practical interventions that improve safety, productivity, quality, and other project success factors. Robust scientific research design is imperative for drawing valid causal inferences when testing the impact of new interventions. Unfortunately, the transient and dynamic nature of construction obfuscates the isolation of variables, thus making true experiments impractical or unethical. With roots in pharmaceutical research, multiple baseline testing (MBT), commonly known as | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Multiple Baseline Testing: Experimental Method for Drawing Causal Inferences in Construction Engineering and Management Research | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 141 | |
| journal issue | 7 | |
| journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000983 | |
| tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 007 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |