Show simple item record

contributor authorAlex Albert
contributor authorMatthew R. Hallowell
contributor authorHelen Lingard
contributor authorBrian M. Kleiner
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:22:26Z
date available2017-05-08T22:22:26Z
date copyrightJuly 2015
date issued2015
identifier other43575529.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/78974
description abstractIdentifying and evaluating solutions for critical industry challenges is a major theme of construction engineering and management (CEM) research. Researchers and practitioners in the construction sector often seek to invent, test, implement, and disseminate practical interventions that improve safety, productivity, quality, and other project success factors. Robust scientific research design is imperative for drawing valid causal inferences when testing the impact of new interventions. Unfortunately, the transient and dynamic nature of construction obfuscates the isolation of variables, thus making true experiments impractical or unethical. With roots in pharmaceutical research, multiple baseline testing (MBT), commonly known as
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMultiple Baseline Testing: Experimental Method for Drawing Causal Inferences in Construction Engineering and Management Research
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000983
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record