Comparing CPT and Vs Liquefaction Triggering MethodsSource: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 009Author:P. K. Robertson
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001338Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Significant developments have taken place over the past 20 years to evaluate the liquefaction potential of soils using in situ tests. The cone penetration test (CPT) is now commonly used to evaluate liquefaction potential in soils. There have also been significant developments to evaluate liquefaction potential based on in situ shear wave velocity (
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | P. K. Robertson | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:11:56Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T22:11:56Z | |
| date copyright | September 2015 | |
| date issued | 2015 | |
| identifier other | 39686928.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73281 | |
| description abstract | Significant developments have taken place over the past 20 years to evaluate the liquefaction potential of soils using in situ tests. The cone penetration test (CPT) is now commonly used to evaluate liquefaction potential in soils. There have also been significant developments to evaluate liquefaction potential based on in situ shear wave velocity ( | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Comparing CPT and Vs Liquefaction Triggering Methods | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 141 | |
| journal issue | 9 | |
| journal title | Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001338 | |
| tree | Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 009 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |