YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Residential Water Conservation in Australia and California

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Ryan Cahill
    ,
    Jay Lund
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000225
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In much of the western United States, reducing residential water use is a major source of water conservation, especially as population growth urbanizes agricultural land. Although estimates of the potential of conservation are useful, the experience of Australia provides a realistic target for residential water conservation. Although reliability of urban water use data is often questionable, it is clear that Australians use less water than Californians, with a similar climate, economy, and culture. Per capita usage is compared, and explanations for use differences are offered. If California had the same residential water use rates as Australia, it could have reduced gross urban water use by 2,600 GL (2.1 million acre-feet) in 2009 and potentially saved 1,800 GL (1.5 million acre-feet) for consumptive use by others.
    • Download: (514.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Residential Water Conservation in Australia and California

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/70085
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRyan Cahill
    contributor authorJay Lund
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:03:27Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:03:27Z
    date copyrightJanuary 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29wr%2E1943-5452%2E0000268.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/70085
    description abstractIn much of the western United States, reducing residential water use is a major source of water conservation, especially as population growth urbanizes agricultural land. Although estimates of the potential of conservation are useful, the experience of Australia provides a realistic target for residential water conservation. Although reliability of urban water use data is often questionable, it is clear that Australians use less water than Californians, with a similar climate, economy, and culture. Per capita usage is compared, and explanations for use differences are offered. If California had the same residential water use rates as Australia, it could have reduced gross urban water use by 2,600 GL (2.1 million acre-feet) in 2009 and potentially saved 1,800 GL (1.5 million acre-feet) for consumptive use by others.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleResidential Water Conservation in Australia and California
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000225
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian