Show simple item record

contributor authorRyan Cahill
contributor authorJay Lund
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:03:27Z
date available2017-05-08T22:03:27Z
date copyrightJanuary 2013
date issued2013
identifier other%28asce%29wr%2E1943-5452%2E0000268.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/70085
description abstractIn much of the western United States, reducing residential water use is a major source of water conservation, especially as population growth urbanizes agricultural land. Although estimates of the potential of conservation are useful, the experience of Australia provides a realistic target for residential water conservation. Although reliability of urban water use data is often questionable, it is clear that Australians use less water than Californians, with a similar climate, economy, and culture. Per capita usage is compared, and explanations for use differences are offered. If California had the same residential water use rates as Australia, it could have reduced gross urban water use by 2,600 GL (2.1 million acre-feet) in 2009 and potentially saved 1,800 GL (1.5 million acre-feet) for consumptive use by others.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleResidential Water Conservation in Australia and California
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000225
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record