Influence of Laboratory Compaction Methods on Shear Performance of Graded Crushed StoneSource: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 010DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000323Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: This paper presents a study on the effects of two laboratory compaction methods, namely, vibrating compaction and modified Proctor compaction on the stress-strain characteristics and shear strength of graded crushed stone. The results of the triaxial shear test show that samples made by vibrating compaction possess higher peak strength, higher initial modulus of elasticity, and lower failure strain than samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Specifically, the cohesion, friction angle, and shear strength of the samples made by the vibrating compaction increase by 38%, 2 degrees, and 10%, respectively, over the samples made by the modified Proctor compaction. In summary, the vibrating compaction method generally performs better than the modified Proctor compaction method, owing to a better distribution of particle orientation. Therefore, it is recommended that, in practice, the vibrating roller should be applied for the construction of graded crushed stone.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Wang Long | |
| contributor author | Xie Xiaoguang | |
| contributor author | Luan Hai | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:55:34Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:55:34Z | |
| date copyright | October 2011 | |
| date issued | 2011 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29mt%2E1943-5533%2E0000356.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66683 | |
| description abstract | This paper presents a study on the effects of two laboratory compaction methods, namely, vibrating compaction and modified Proctor compaction on the stress-strain characteristics and shear strength of graded crushed stone. The results of the triaxial shear test show that samples made by vibrating compaction possess higher peak strength, higher initial modulus of elasticity, and lower failure strain than samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Specifically, the cohesion, friction angle, and shear strength of the samples made by the vibrating compaction increase by 38%, 2 degrees, and 10%, respectively, over the samples made by the modified Proctor compaction. In summary, the vibrating compaction method generally performs better than the modified Proctor compaction method, owing to a better distribution of particle orientation. Therefore, it is recommended that, in practice, the vibrating roller should be applied for the construction of graded crushed stone. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Influence of Laboratory Compaction Methods on Shear Performance of Graded Crushed Stone | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 23 | |
| journal issue | 10 | |
| journal title | Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000323 | |
| tree | Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 010 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |