Show simple item record

contributor authorWang Long
contributor authorXie Xiaoguang
contributor authorLuan Hai
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:55:34Z
date available2017-05-08T21:55:34Z
date copyrightOctober 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29mt%2E1943-5533%2E0000356.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66683
description abstractThis paper presents a study on the effects of two laboratory compaction methods, namely, vibrating compaction and modified Proctor compaction on the stress-strain characteristics and shear strength of graded crushed stone. The results of the triaxial shear test show that samples made by vibrating compaction possess higher peak strength, higher initial modulus of elasticity, and lower failure strain than samples made by the modified proctor compaction. Specifically, the cohesion, friction angle, and shear strength of the samples made by the vibrating compaction increase by 38%, 2 degrees, and 10%, respectively, over the samples made by the modified Proctor compaction. In summary, the vibrating compaction method generally performs better than the modified Proctor compaction method, owing to a better distribution of particle orientation. Therefore, it is recommended that, in practice, the vibrating roller should be applied for the construction of graded crushed stone.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleInfluence of Laboratory Compaction Methods on Shear Performance of Graded Crushed Stone
typeJournal Paper
journal volume23
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000323
treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record