YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Management Thinking in the Earned Value Method System and the Last Planner System

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Yong-Woo Kim
    ,
    Glenn Ballard
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000026
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Management theory has been neglected in the construction industry, which has rather focused on best practices. This paper investigates the theories implicit in two prevalent project control systems: the earned value method (EVM) and the last planner system (LPS). The study introduces two fundamental and competing conceptualizations of management: managing by means (MBM) and managing by results (MBR). The EVM is found to be based on MBR. However, project control based on MBR is argued to be inappropriate for managing at the operational level where tasks are highly interdependent. The LPS is found to be based on the MBM view. The empirical evidence from literature and case study suggested that the MBM view is more appropriate to manage works when it is applied to the operation level where each task is highly interdependent.
    • Download: (380.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Management Thinking in the Earned Value Method System and the Last Planner System

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/66086
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYong-Woo Kim
    contributor authorGlenn Ballard
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:27Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:27Z
    date copyrightOctober 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier other%28asce%29me%2E1943-5479%2E0000059.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66086
    description abstractManagement theory has been neglected in the construction industry, which has rather focused on best practices. This paper investigates the theories implicit in two prevalent project control systems: the earned value method (EVM) and the last planner system (LPS). The study introduces two fundamental and competing conceptualizations of management: managing by means (MBM) and managing by results (MBR). The EVM is found to be based on MBR. However, project control based on MBR is argued to be inappropriate for managing at the operational level where tasks are highly interdependent. The LPS is found to be based on the MBM view. The empirical evidence from literature and case study suggested that the MBM view is more appropriate to manage works when it is applied to the operation level where each task is highly interdependent.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleManagement Thinking in the Earned Value Method System and the Last Planner System
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume26
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000026
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian