Show simple item record

contributor authorYong-Woo Kim
contributor authorGlenn Ballard
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:27Z
date available2017-05-08T21:54:27Z
date copyrightOctober 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29me%2E1943-5479%2E0000059.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66086
description abstractManagement theory has been neglected in the construction industry, which has rather focused on best practices. This paper investigates the theories implicit in two prevalent project control systems: the earned value method (EVM) and the last planner system (LPS). The study introduces two fundamental and competing conceptualizations of management: managing by means (MBM) and managing by results (MBR). The EVM is found to be based on MBR. However, project control based on MBR is argued to be inappropriate for managing at the operational level where tasks are highly interdependent. The LPS is found to be based on the MBM view. The empirical evidence from literature and case study suggested that the MBM view is more appropriate to manage works when it is applied to the operation level where each task is highly interdependent.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleManagement Thinking in the Earned Value Method System and the Last Planner System
typeJournal Paper
journal volume26
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000026
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record