YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Research and Development Priorities for Energy Islanding of Military and Industrial Installations

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2013:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Michelle C. Hamilton
    ,
    James H. Lambert
    ,
    Jeffrey M. Keisler
    ,
    Franklin H. Holcomb
    ,
    Igor Linkov
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000133
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Research and development for energy systems (e.g., smart and secure microgrids for industrial and military installations and solar cogeneration technologies) must account for deep uncertainties and emergent conditions including economic, regulatory, technological, mission, demographic, and environmental or ecological, among others. Deep uncertainties involve structural and qualitative perspectives or trends that change the game. Recent literature has identified emergent conditions and deep uncertainties that are most influential to decision criteria priorities among existing energy assets and systems. This paper introduces a practical method to help prioritize strategic energy research and development investments and minimize opportunity loss or program risk for investments with a long time horizon. There are a number of interesting observations that can be perceived from this method including robustness, scenario influence, risk, and opportunity. The method is recommended to help achieve consensus of program managers, installation commanders, energy managers, technology vendors, urban planners, and customers and tenants. A quantitative demonstration is provided that addresses five scenarios of deep uncertainty, ten performance criteria, and six investment portfolios.
    • Download: (8.321Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Research and Development Priorities for Energy Islanding of Military and Industrial Installations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65723
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMichelle C. Hamilton
    contributor authorJames H. Lambert
    contributor authorJeffrey M. Keisler
    contributor authorFranklin H. Holcomb
    contributor authorIgor Linkov
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:53:52Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:53:52Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29is%2E1943-555x%2E0000163.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65723
    description abstractResearch and development for energy systems (e.g., smart and secure microgrids for industrial and military installations and solar cogeneration technologies) must account for deep uncertainties and emergent conditions including economic, regulatory, technological, mission, demographic, and environmental or ecological, among others. Deep uncertainties involve structural and qualitative perspectives or trends that change the game. Recent literature has identified emergent conditions and deep uncertainties that are most influential to decision criteria priorities among existing energy assets and systems. This paper introduces a practical method to help prioritize strategic energy research and development investments and minimize opportunity loss or program risk for investments with a long time horizon. There are a number of interesting observations that can be perceived from this method including robustness, scenario influence, risk, and opportunity. The method is recommended to help achieve consensus of program managers, installation commanders, energy managers, technology vendors, urban planners, and customers and tenants. A quantitative demonstration is provided that addresses five scenarios of deep uncertainty, ten performance criteria, and six investment portfolios.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleResearch and Development Priorities for Energy Islanding of Military and Industrial Installations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume19
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000133
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2013:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian