Geotechnical Surprises—Or Are They? 1Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 008Author:James K. Mitchell
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000040Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The nature and scope of geotechnical engineering are such that the problems and projects we deal with are a never ending source of both challenge and excitement. In most cases we do very well in defining the problems and developing suitable solutions resulting in successful completed projects. Unfortunately, however, there remain far too many cases in which something goes wrong. Often a failure or other bad outcome comes as a complete surprise. However, in a significant number of cases perhaps the unexpected or surprise outcome might have been anticipated. Three illustrative case histories are reviewed and then examined to see if what went wrong might reasonably have been anticipated. The first involves a well-known and much studied stability failure along the composite double liner system of a hazardous waste landfill. The second is concerned with unusual soil types that were the cause of major difficulties during earthwork construction of a large embankment dam. The third is about a very large, slow-moving landslide that caused major distress to a roadway and impacted the safety of a large bridge. Several reasons why unexpected adverse outcomes may occur are stated and some possible means for reducing their frequency and severity in the future are proposed.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | James K. Mitchell | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:46:19Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:46:19Z | |
date copyright | August 2009 | |
date issued | 2009 | |
identifier other | %28asce%29gt%2E1943-5606%2E0000055.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/61817 | |
description abstract | The nature and scope of geotechnical engineering are such that the problems and projects we deal with are a never ending source of both challenge and excitement. In most cases we do very well in defining the problems and developing suitable solutions resulting in successful completed projects. Unfortunately, however, there remain far too many cases in which something goes wrong. Often a failure or other bad outcome comes as a complete surprise. However, in a significant number of cases perhaps the unexpected or surprise outcome might have been anticipated. Three illustrative case histories are reviewed and then examined to see if what went wrong might reasonably have been anticipated. The first involves a well-known and much studied stability failure along the composite double liner system of a hazardous waste landfill. The second is concerned with unusual soil types that were the cause of major difficulties during earthwork construction of a large embankment dam. The third is about a very large, slow-moving landslide that caused major distress to a roadway and impacted the safety of a large bridge. Several reasons why unexpected adverse outcomes may occur are stated and some possible means for reducing their frequency and severity in the future are proposed. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Geotechnical Surprises—Or Are They? 1 | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 135 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000040 | |
tree | Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |