YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Continuous and Sequencing Batch Operated Biofilters for Treatment of Gas-Phase Methyl Ethyl Ketone

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    William M. Moe
    ,
    Congna Li
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:3(300)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Although biofiltration has been used successfully to remove and biodegrade a wide variety of gas-phase organic contaminants generated by industrial facilities and environmental remediation efforts, the ability of conventional biofilters to maintain high removal efficiency during short-term, unsteady-state, elevated loading conditions is limited. A promising alternative for improving biofilter performance during transient elevated loading conditions while minimizing the disadvantages of conventional treatment technologies is utilization of adsorption packing media and implementation of sequencing batch operating strategies. In the studies described herein, a continuous-flow biofilter (CFB) and a sequencing batch biofilter (SBB) were operated for more than 300 days to treat a methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) contaminated gas stream. The packing medium for both biofilters consisted of activated carbon coated polyurethane foam cubes. Both biofilters exhibited stable long-term performance with greater than 99% removal of the influent
    • Download: (389.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Continuous and Sequencing Batch Operated Biofilters for Treatment of Gas-Phase Methyl Ethyl Ketone

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/60631
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWilliam M. Moe
    contributor authorCongna Li
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:43:23Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:43:23Z
    date copyrightMarch 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%282004%29130%3A3%28300%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60631
    description abstractAlthough biofiltration has been used successfully to remove and biodegrade a wide variety of gas-phase organic contaminants generated by industrial facilities and environmental remediation efforts, the ability of conventional biofilters to maintain high removal efficiency during short-term, unsteady-state, elevated loading conditions is limited. A promising alternative for improving biofilter performance during transient elevated loading conditions while minimizing the disadvantages of conventional treatment technologies is utilization of adsorption packing media and implementation of sequencing batch operating strategies. In the studies described herein, a continuous-flow biofilter (CFB) and a sequencing batch biofilter (SBB) were operated for more than 300 days to treat a methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) contaminated gas stream. The packing medium for both biofilters consisted of activated carbon coated polyurethane foam cubes. Both biofilters exhibited stable long-term performance with greater than 99% removal of the influent
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison of Continuous and Sequencing Batch Operated Biofilters for Treatment of Gas-Phase Methyl Ethyl Ketone
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:3(300)
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian