Show simple item record

contributor authorWilliam M. Moe
contributor authorCongna Li
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:43:23Z
date available2017-05-08T21:43:23Z
date copyrightMarch 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%282004%29130%3A3%28300%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/60631
description abstractAlthough biofiltration has been used successfully to remove and biodegrade a wide variety of gas-phase organic contaminants generated by industrial facilities and environmental remediation efforts, the ability of conventional biofilters to maintain high removal efficiency during short-term, unsteady-state, elevated loading conditions is limited. A promising alternative for improving biofilter performance during transient elevated loading conditions while minimizing the disadvantages of conventional treatment technologies is utilization of adsorption packing media and implementation of sequencing batch operating strategies. In the studies described herein, a continuous-flow biofilter (CFB) and a sequencing batch biofilter (SBB) were operated for more than 300 days to treat a methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) contaminated gas stream. The packing medium for both biofilters consisted of activated carbon coated polyurethane foam cubes. Both biofilters exhibited stable long-term performance with greater than 99% removal of the influent
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparison of Continuous and Sequencing Batch Operated Biofilters for Treatment of Gas-Phase Methyl Ethyl Ketone
typeJournal Paper
journal volume130
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:3(300)
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record