| contributor author | John E. Taylor | |
| contributor author | Carrie Sturts Dossick | |
| contributor author | Michael Garvin | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:39:17Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:39:17Z | |
| date copyright | April 2011 | |
| date issued | 2011 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000289.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58437 | |
| description abstract | The case-study research method is popular across various disciplines; however, critics of the method argue that results from this form of research are applicable only to the case studied and cannot be generalized further. In the field of construction engineering and management (CEM), the number of papers employing case-study research methods over the past decade has increased substantially. As the method proliferates, the question arises: are CEM case studies being performed with sufficient validity and reliability to meet the burden of proof to generalize from the case-study findings? Meeting the burden of proof is particularly critical in CEM because of the unique, site-based nature of the projects and industry. This paper presents a review of 156 papers employing case studies published in the | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Meeting the Burden of Proof with Case-Study Research | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 137 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000283 | |
| tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2011:;Volume ( 137 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |