Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn E. Taylor
contributor authorCarrie Sturts Dossick
contributor authorMichael Garvin
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:39:17Z
date available2017-05-08T21:39:17Z
date copyrightApril 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000289.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58437
description abstractThe case-study research method is popular across various disciplines; however, critics of the method argue that results from this form of research are applicable only to the case studied and cannot be generalized further. In the field of construction engineering and management (CEM), the number of papers employing case-study research methods over the past decade has increased substantially. As the method proliferates, the question arises: are CEM case studies being performed with sufficient validity and reliability to meet the burden of proof to generalize from the case-study findings? Meeting the burden of proof is particularly critical in CEM because of the unique, site-based nature of the projects and industry. This paper presents a review of 156 papers employing case studies published in the
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMeeting the Burden of Proof with Case-Study Research
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000283
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2011:;Volume ( 137 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record