contributor author | Charles Edward Williams Jr. | |
contributor author | Philip W. Johnson | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:38:22Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:38:22Z | |
date copyright | February 2015 | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier other | %28asce%29cf%2E1943-5509%2E0000487.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58082 | |
description abstract | This paper stems from research in the University of Alabama’s Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering. Engineering design failures fall into two broad categories, those that occur because of a hitherto unknown or unprecedented technical cause, and those that occur because of a known cause that was overlooked during the design process. The latter can be considered a failure of design management, and the purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast inadequate design management to unprecedented technical issues as a cause for engineering failures. Failures that occur to improper maintenance or abuse are not the scope of this paper. Two approaches were taken, namely: (1) evaluation of current and historical engineering failures for instances of inadequate design management and/or unprecedented technical issues; and (2) review of filed claims data for design errors and omissions to determine whether inadequate design management is a substantial issue. This research may provide useful information in understanding how both categories limit the success of the design process. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Inadequate Design Management Compared with Unprecedented Technical Issues as Causes for Engineering Failure | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 29 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000482 | |
tree | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2015:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |