| contributor author | Victor Gane | |
| contributor author | John Haymaker | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:33:24Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:33:24Z | |
| date copyright | September 2010 | |
| date issued | 2010 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000017.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56018 | |
| description abstract | This paper presents an analysis of current conceptual design processes for high-rise buildings. We synthesize a method to document and measure these processes and use it to analyze data from several case studies and a survey of leading architectural and engineering design firms. We describe current high-rise conceptual design process in terms of the following: design team size, composition, and time investment; clarity of goal definition; number and range of design options generated; number and type of model-based analyses performed; and the criteria used for decision making. We identify several potential weaknesses in current design processes including lack of clarity in goal definition and a low quantity of generated and analyzed options. We argue that potentially higher performing designs are being left unconsidered and discuss the potential reasons and costs. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Benchmarking Current Conceptual High-Rise Design Processes | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 16 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Architectural Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000017 | |
| tree | Journal of Architectural Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |