Show simple item record

contributor authorVictor Gane
contributor authorJohn Haymaker
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:24Z
date available2017-05-08T21:33:24Z
date copyrightSeptember 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000017.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56018
description abstractThis paper presents an analysis of current conceptual design processes for high-rise buildings. We synthesize a method to document and measure these processes and use it to analyze data from several case studies and a survey of leading architectural and engineering design firms. We describe current high-rise conceptual design process in terms of the following: design team size, composition, and time investment; clarity of goal definition; number and range of design options generated; number and type of model-based analyses performed; and the criteria used for decision making. We identify several potential weaknesses in current design processes including lack of clarity in goal definition and a low quantity of generated and analyzed options. We argue that potentially higher performing designs are being left unconsidered and discuss the potential reasons and costs.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBenchmarking Current Conceptual High-Rise Design Processes
typeJournal Paper
journal volume16
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000017
treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record