YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Constitutive Behavior of Geosynthetic Interfaces

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2001:;Volume ( 127 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    Jacob J. B. Esterhuizen
    ,
    George M. Filz
    ,
    J. Michael Duncan
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(834)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: New displacement-softening and work-softening models were developed to describe the sliding of geosynthetic interfaces, such as those in landfill liners. The displacement-softening formulation is based on the assumption that strength reduction at the interface can be related to nonrecoverable (plastic) shear displacement. The model uses three relationships: (1) the peak strength envelope; (2) the residual strength envelope; and (3) the residual factor versus displacement ratio relationship, which is a nondimensional expression of the rate at which displacement-softening occurs. The displacement-softening model is accurate for shearing when the normal stress stays constant. When normal stress increases during shearing, the displacement-softening formulation overpredicts damage to geosynthetic interfaces. The work-softening model was developed to compute interface softening during conditions of increasing normal stress. This formulation is based on the assumption that the postpeak reduction in shear strength can be attributed to plastic shear work rather than plastic shear displacement. By calculating an equivalent plastic shear displacement for a given amount of plastic shear work, the work-softening model can be formulated using the same basic relationships as the displacement-softening model. The work-softening model significantly outperformed the displacement-softening model when simulating laboratory tests under conditions of increasing normal stress.
    • Download: (135.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Constitutive Behavior of Geosynthetic Interfaces

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/51966
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJacob J. B. Esterhuizen
    contributor authorGeorge M. Filz
    contributor authorJ. Michael Duncan
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:27:06Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:27:06Z
    date copyrightOctober 2001
    date issued2001
    identifier other%28asce%291090-0241%282001%29127%3A10%28834%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/51966
    description abstractNew displacement-softening and work-softening models were developed to describe the sliding of geosynthetic interfaces, such as those in landfill liners. The displacement-softening formulation is based on the assumption that strength reduction at the interface can be related to nonrecoverable (plastic) shear displacement. The model uses three relationships: (1) the peak strength envelope; (2) the residual strength envelope; and (3) the residual factor versus displacement ratio relationship, which is a nondimensional expression of the rate at which displacement-softening occurs. The displacement-softening model is accurate for shearing when the normal stress stays constant. When normal stress increases during shearing, the displacement-softening formulation overpredicts damage to geosynthetic interfaces. The work-softening model was developed to compute interface softening during conditions of increasing normal stress. This formulation is based on the assumption that the postpeak reduction in shear strength can be attributed to plastic shear work rather than plastic shear displacement. By calculating an equivalent plastic shear displacement for a given amount of plastic shear work, the work-softening model can be formulated using the same basic relationships as the displacement-softening model. The work-softening model significantly outperformed the displacement-softening model when simulating laboratory tests under conditions of increasing normal stress.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleConstitutive Behavior of Geosynthetic Interfaces
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume127
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(834)
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2001:;Volume ( 127 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian