YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Secondary Reinforcement for Slopes

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Radoslaw L. Michalowski
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:12(1166)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Secondary reinforcement in slopes is typically designed without any stability considerations. A rational stability analysis is attempted in this paper, based on shallow collapse mechanisms confined to the neighborhood of the slope face. The kinematic theorem of limit analysis is used to arrive at the necessary spacing of the secondary reinforcement and its strength and length. Analysis of a collapse limited to the soil between the layers of reinforcement is used to determine the required soil cohesion necessary to maintain stability. Since this cohesion depends on the size of the mechanism, the spacing of the secondary geosynthetic can be determined from this analysis. Some cohesion is usually present in the zone close to the slope face because of moisture in the soil, cementation due to a small amount of fine particles, or vegetation. Even a small amount of cohesion may have a significant effect on the stability. The strength and length of secondary reinforcement are determined from shallow collapse mechanisms engaging secondary reinforcement in tension. The slope face becomes most susceptible to failure when the soil becomes saturated, because of the seepage and buoyancy forces, and because of the loss of apparent cohesion. A more approximate analysis based on an infinite slope model is also shown. Its description is limited to the presentation of the concept. This method relies heavily on the cohesion distribution in the zone close to the slope face. Because an estimation of this distribution is difficult, the infinite slope model may be difficult to apply in practice.
    • Download: (133.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Secondary Reinforcement for Slopes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/51840
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRadoslaw L. Michalowski
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:26:54Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:26:54Z
    date copyrightDecember 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier other%28asce%291090-0241%282000%29126%3A12%281166%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/51840
    description abstractSecondary reinforcement in slopes is typically designed without any stability considerations. A rational stability analysis is attempted in this paper, based on shallow collapse mechanisms confined to the neighborhood of the slope face. The kinematic theorem of limit analysis is used to arrive at the necessary spacing of the secondary reinforcement and its strength and length. Analysis of a collapse limited to the soil between the layers of reinforcement is used to determine the required soil cohesion necessary to maintain stability. Since this cohesion depends on the size of the mechanism, the spacing of the secondary geosynthetic can be determined from this analysis. Some cohesion is usually present in the zone close to the slope face because of moisture in the soil, cementation due to a small amount of fine particles, or vegetation. Even a small amount of cohesion may have a significant effect on the stability. The strength and length of secondary reinforcement are determined from shallow collapse mechanisms engaging secondary reinforcement in tension. The slope face becomes most susceptible to failure when the soil becomes saturated, because of the seepage and buoyancy forces, and because of the loss of apparent cohesion. A more approximate analysis based on an infinite slope model is also shown. Its description is limited to the presentation of the concept. This method relies heavily on the cohesion distribution in the zone close to the slope face. Because an estimation of this distribution is difficult, the infinite slope model may be difficult to apply in practice.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSecondary Reinforcement for Slopes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume126
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:12(1166)
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian