YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of Disturbance on Undrained Strengths Interpreted from Pressuremeter Tests

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Charles P. Aubeny
    ,
    Andrew J. Whittle
    ,
    Charles C. Ladd
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:12(1133)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Although the cylindrical cavity expansion theory should provide a sound basis for obtaining the undrained shear strength of clays from pressuremeter tests, the interpreted strengths are often inconsistent with data measured in high-quality laboratory tests. This paper investigates how the pressuremeter results are affected by disturbances that inevitably occur during device installation. The installation of self-boring and displacement-type pressuremeters is simulated using strain path analyses, with realistic effective stress-strain-strength properties described by the MIT-E3 model. Derived strengths obtained from the simulated expansion of displacement-type pressuremeters tend to underestimate the in situ/cavity expansion strength by amounts that depend on the relative volume of soil displaced, the time delay prior to testing, and the initial overconsolidation ratio of the clay. Interpretation procedures using the simulated contraction curves give much more reliable estimates of the true undrained shear strength. The simulated disturbance effects of self boring lead to derived peak shear stresses that are significantly higher than the reference undrained shear strengths. This overestimate depends on the volume of soil removed during installation and is enhanced when the finite membrane length is included in the analyses. Self-boring pressuremeter data from a well-documented test site in Boston confirm the general character of the predicted pressuremeter stress-strain behavior. The theoretical analyses underestimate the peak strengths derived from self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) expansion tests, but match closely the measured postpeak resistance in the strain range of 3–6% (saddle point condition). Saddle point strengths are similar in magnitude to the shear strengths measured in laboratory undrained triaxial compression tests at this site. The current predictions are not able to explain the very high shear strengths derived from the SBPM contraction curves.
    • Download: (276.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of Disturbance on Undrained Strengths Interpreted from Pressuremeter Tests

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/51836
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCharles P. Aubeny
    contributor authorAndrew J. Whittle
    contributor authorCharles C. Ladd
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:26:53Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:26:53Z
    date copyrightDecember 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier other%28asce%291090-0241%282000%29126%3A12%281133%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/51836
    description abstractAlthough the cylindrical cavity expansion theory should provide a sound basis for obtaining the undrained shear strength of clays from pressuremeter tests, the interpreted strengths are often inconsistent with data measured in high-quality laboratory tests. This paper investigates how the pressuremeter results are affected by disturbances that inevitably occur during device installation. The installation of self-boring and displacement-type pressuremeters is simulated using strain path analyses, with realistic effective stress-strain-strength properties described by the MIT-E3 model. Derived strengths obtained from the simulated expansion of displacement-type pressuremeters tend to underestimate the in situ/cavity expansion strength by amounts that depend on the relative volume of soil displaced, the time delay prior to testing, and the initial overconsolidation ratio of the clay. Interpretation procedures using the simulated contraction curves give much more reliable estimates of the true undrained shear strength. The simulated disturbance effects of self boring lead to derived peak shear stresses that are significantly higher than the reference undrained shear strengths. This overestimate depends on the volume of soil removed during installation and is enhanced when the finite membrane length is included in the analyses. Self-boring pressuremeter data from a well-documented test site in Boston confirm the general character of the predicted pressuremeter stress-strain behavior. The theoretical analyses underestimate the peak strengths derived from self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) expansion tests, but match closely the measured postpeak resistance in the strain range of 3–6% (saddle point condition). Saddle point strengths are similar in magnitude to the shear strengths measured in laboratory undrained triaxial compression tests at this site. The current predictions are not able to explain the very high shear strengths derived from the SBPM contraction curves.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEffects of Disturbance on Undrained Strengths Interpreted from Pressuremeter Tests
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume126
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:12(1133)
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian