contributor author | Melissa Bilec | |
contributor author | Robert Ries | |
contributor author | H. Scott Matthews | |
contributor author | Aurora L. Sharrard | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:21:27Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:21:27Z | |
date copyright | December 2006 | |
date issued | 2006 | |
identifier other | %28asce%291076-0342%282006%2912%3A4%28207%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48272 | |
description abstract | Design and construction industries, along with owners, have an increasing interest in and responsibility for the environmental impacts of buildings. Since the environmental impacts of a building’s life cycle are considerable, quantification of all phases is important, especially the construction phase, which is often glossed over. This research focuses on the construction phase of a building project. Generally, the life-cycle inventory created in performing a life-cycle assessment (LCA) is developed using either a process or input–output approach; however, both techniques have distinct advantages and disadvantages. A hybrid approach combining both methods’ advantages has been proposed and will be demonstrated. Existing hybrid models are reviewed, along with a recommendation of a hybrid model for construction. A preliminary case study of a precast concrete parking garage’s construction using hybrid LCA methodology is presented. Preliminary investigations indicate transportation, equipment activity, and support functions have the largest effects on the environment. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 12 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Infrastructure Systems | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:4(207) | |
tree | Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2006:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |