YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Structural Surface-Achieving Model in the Teaching and Learning Process for Construction Engineering Students

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Mei-Yung Leung
    ,
    Ying Wang
    ,
    David K. K. Chan
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:4(327)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Education is a systematic teaching-learning process involving four main components (teachers, students, knowledge, and the environment) and three main subprocesses (teaching, learning, and evaluation). Throughout the education process, students’ learning is considered as the core subprocess, though various interactions are involved among the variables in the components. The surface-achieving learning approach (achieving motive and surface strategy) is not generally recommended by educational psychologists, but it is the most popular learning approach used by construction engineering students in Hong Kong. In order to investigate the reasons for this phenomenon, a structural surface-achieving learning model is established that includes key learning factors. In this paper, teaching approach, learning approach (achieving motive and surface strategy), year of study, gender, performance, and satisfaction are all considered as major elements of the teaching-learning process. Using the LISREL program, three optimized structural equation models were established separately for the three teaching approaches (transferring, shaping, and traveling). The study confirmed a partial causal relationship among the hypothetical variables and revealed six interesting points: (1) shaping is an exogenous variable that has the least effect on the surface-achieving learning approach among the three teaching approaches; (2) the traveling teaching approach, like the transferring and shaping teaching approaches, causes students to adopt the surface strategy in the learning process; (3) good performance can be obtained even though the surface strategy is adopted by construction students in Hong Kong; (4) students’ performance is a factor encouraging or discouraging educators to use the traveling teaching approach in construction education; (5) satisfaction is an essential variable that induces students to learn with an achieving motive; and (6) female construction students often perform better than their male counterparts.
    • Download: (571.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Structural Surface-Achieving Model in the Teaching and Learning Process for Construction Engineering Students

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47880
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMei-Yung Leung
    contributor authorYing Wang
    contributor authorDavid K. K. Chan
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
    date copyrightOctober 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A4%28327%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47880
    description abstractEducation is a systematic teaching-learning process involving four main components (teachers, students, knowledge, and the environment) and three main subprocesses (teaching, learning, and evaluation). Throughout the education process, students’ learning is considered as the core subprocess, though various interactions are involved among the variables in the components. The surface-achieving learning approach (achieving motive and surface strategy) is not generally recommended by educational psychologists, but it is the most popular learning approach used by construction engineering students in Hong Kong. In order to investigate the reasons for this phenomenon, a structural surface-achieving learning model is established that includes key learning factors. In this paper, teaching approach, learning approach (achieving motive and surface strategy), year of study, gender, performance, and satisfaction are all considered as major elements of the teaching-learning process. Using the LISREL program, three optimized structural equation models were established separately for the three teaching approaches (transferring, shaping, and traveling). The study confirmed a partial causal relationship among the hypothetical variables and revealed six interesting points: (1) shaping is an exogenous variable that has the least effect on the surface-achieving learning approach among the three teaching approaches; (2) the traveling teaching approach, like the transferring and shaping teaching approaches, causes students to adopt the surface strategy in the learning process; (3) good performance can be obtained even though the surface strategy is adopted by construction students in Hong Kong; (4) students’ performance is a factor encouraging or discouraging educators to use the traveling teaching approach in construction education; (5) satisfaction is an essential variable that induces students to learn with an achieving motive; and (6) female construction students often perform better than their male counterparts.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleStructural Surface-Achieving Model in the Teaching and Learning Process for Construction Engineering Students
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:4(327)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian