Show simple item record

contributor authorMei-Yung Leung
contributor authorYing Wang
contributor authorDavid K. K. Chan
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:50Z
date copyrightOctober 2007
date issued2007
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282007%29133%3A4%28327%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47880
description abstractEducation is a systematic teaching-learning process involving four main components (teachers, students, knowledge, and the environment) and three main subprocesses (teaching, learning, and evaluation). Throughout the education process, students’ learning is considered as the core subprocess, though various interactions are involved among the variables in the components. The surface-achieving learning approach (achieving motive and surface strategy) is not generally recommended by educational psychologists, but it is the most popular learning approach used by construction engineering students in Hong Kong. In order to investigate the reasons for this phenomenon, a structural surface-achieving learning model is established that includes key learning factors. In this paper, teaching approach, learning approach (achieving motive and surface strategy), year of study, gender, performance, and satisfaction are all considered as major elements of the teaching-learning process. Using the LISREL program, three optimized structural equation models were established separately for the three teaching approaches (transferring, shaping, and traveling). The study confirmed a partial causal relationship among the hypothetical variables and revealed six interesting points: (1) shaping is an exogenous variable that has the least effect on the surface-achieving learning approach among the three teaching approaches; (2) the traveling teaching approach, like the transferring and shaping teaching approaches, causes students to adopt the surface strategy in the learning process; (3) good performance can be obtained even though the surface strategy is adopted by construction students in Hong Kong; (4) students’ performance is a factor encouraging or discouraging educators to use the traveling teaching approach in construction education; (5) satisfaction is an essential variable that induces students to learn with an achieving motive; and (6) female construction students often perform better than their male counterparts.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleStructural Surface-Achieving Model in the Teaching and Learning Process for Construction Engineering Students
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:4(327)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record