YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    ADR, TQM, Partnering, and Other Management Fantasies

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    F. H. “Bud” Griffis
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1992)118:4(331)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper addresses the current management problems associated with the architect‐engineering‐construction industry. It makes the assertion that the current fads of total quality management (TQM), alternate dispute resolution (ADR), partnering, and some of the older concepts of management by objective, exception, etc., skirt the problems facing the industry. The concepts of TQM, ADR, and partnering all make oblique approaches to apply W. Edward Deming's management fundamentals and leadership to the construction team and provide the solution necessary for competitive productivity in the construction industry. They are a move toward Deming's management approach that provided the road map for Japan to win the battle of competitive productivity. His 14 points with strong leadership in modifying the way the construction industry does business in the United States are proposed as an approach for the right solution. Arguments are presented why direct adoption of Deming's approach cannot work in the present culture of the construction industry.
    • Download: (968.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      ADR, TQM, Partnering, and Other Management Fantasies

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47156
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorF. H. “Bud” Griffis
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:39Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:19:39Z
    date copyrightOctober 1992
    date issued1992
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281992%29118%3A4%28331%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47156
    description abstractThis paper addresses the current management problems associated with the architect‐engineering‐construction industry. It makes the assertion that the current fads of total quality management (TQM), alternate dispute resolution (ADR), partnering, and some of the older concepts of management by objective, exception, etc., skirt the problems facing the industry. The concepts of TQM, ADR, and partnering all make oblique approaches to apply W. Edward Deming's management fundamentals and leadership to the construction team and provide the solution necessary for competitive productivity in the construction industry. They are a move toward Deming's management approach that provided the road map for Japan to win the battle of competitive productivity. His 14 points with strong leadership in modifying the way the construction industry does business in the United States are proposed as an approach for the right solution. Arguments are presented why direct adoption of Deming's approach cannot work in the present culture of the construction industry.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleADR, TQM, Partnering, and Other Management Fantasies
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume118
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1992)118:4(331)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian