Show simple item record

contributor authorF. H. “Bud” Griffis
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:39Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:39Z
date copyrightOctober 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281992%29118%3A4%28331%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47156
description abstractThis paper addresses the current management problems associated with the architect‐engineering‐construction industry. It makes the assertion that the current fads of total quality management (TQM), alternate dispute resolution (ADR), partnering, and some of the older concepts of management by objective, exception, etc., skirt the problems facing the industry. The concepts of TQM, ADR, and partnering all make oblique approaches to apply W. Edward Deming's management fundamentals and leadership to the construction team and provide the solution necessary for competitive productivity in the construction industry. They are a move toward Deming's management approach that provided the road map for Japan to win the battle of competitive productivity. His 14 points with strong leadership in modifying the way the construction industry does business in the United States are proposed as an approach for the right solution. Arguments are presented why direct adoption of Deming's approach cannot work in the present culture of the construction industry.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleADR, TQM, Partnering, and Other Management Fantasies
typeJournal Paper
journal volume118
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1992)118:4(331)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record