YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Level of Significance Selection in Engineering Analysis

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Kaye L. Brubaker
    ,
    Richard H. McCuen
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1990)116:4(375)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In many statistical analyses for the development of engineering design models, the use of a 5% level of significance is based on tradition. Stepwise regression analysis, using the 5% level of significance, is applied to measured data from engineering systems. The results demonstrate that the commonly used 5% criterion can lead to an incorrect model under certain conditions. Specifically, models with either irrational or inaccurate regression coefficients or too many predictor variables may result. The application of the 5% criterion in stepwise regression analysis is critically assessed, and the conditions under which problems occur are identifled. An alternative decision approach, based on an analysis of the partial
    • Download: (900.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Level of Significance Selection in Engineering Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47035
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKaye L. Brubaker
    contributor authorRichard H. McCuen
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
    date copyrightOctober 1990
    date issued1990
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281990%29116%3A4%28375%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47035
    description abstractIn many statistical analyses for the development of engineering design models, the use of a 5% level of significance is based on tradition. Stepwise regression analysis, using the 5% level of significance, is applied to measured data from engineering systems. The results demonstrate that the commonly used 5% criterion can lead to an incorrect model under certain conditions. Specifically, models with either irrational or inaccurate regression coefficients or too many predictor variables may result. The application of the 5% criterion in stepwise regression analysis is critically assessed, and the conditions under which problems occur are identifled. An alternative decision approach, based on an analysis of the partial
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLevel of Significance Selection in Engineering Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume116
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1990)116:4(375)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian