Show simple item record

contributor authorKaye L. Brubaker
contributor authorRichard H. McCuen
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
date available2017-05-08T21:19:24Z
date copyrightOctober 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%281990%29116%3A4%28375%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47035
description abstractIn many statistical analyses for the development of engineering design models, the use of a 5% level of significance is based on tradition. Stepwise regression analysis, using the 5% level of significance, is applied to measured data from engineering systems. The results demonstrate that the commonly used 5% criterion can lead to an incorrect model under certain conditions. Specifically, models with either irrational or inaccurate regression coefficients or too many predictor variables may result. The application of the 5% criterion in stepwise regression analysis is critically assessed, and the conditions under which problems occur are identifled. An alternative decision approach, based on an analysis of the partial
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLevel of Significance Selection in Engineering Analysis
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1990)116:4(375)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record