contributor author | Chengqing Wu | |
contributor author | Hong Hao | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:15:22Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:15:22Z | |
date copyright | December 2007 | |
date issued | 2007 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290887-3828%282007%2921%3A6%28422%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44530 | |
description abstract | Terrorist bombing and accidental explosion may generate extreme loading conditions on nearby structures, resulting in damage and even collapse of structures. The degree of damage to a structure depends on the capacity of the detonation and its location as well as structural conditions. Some guidelines are available to assess the safety of unstrengthened buildings to airblast loads. These guidelines are usually given in terms of the safe scaled distance between explosion center and structure, whereas the structure conditions, which also affect its performance, are not explicitly defined. The safe scaled distance is obtained primarily from field blasting tests and experiences of structure damage to blast loads. These guidelines can be used for a quick safety assessment of structures, but do not provide clear damage scenarios of the structures. In a previous paper, damages of low-rise masonry infilled reinforced concrete (RC) structures to surface explosion of different scaled distances are numerically simulated. It was found that RC frame would collapse when the scaled distance was less than | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Safe Scaled Distance for Masonry Infilled RC Frame Structures Subjected to Airblast Loads | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 21 | |
journal issue | 6 | |
journal title | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:6(422) | |
tree | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2007:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 006 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |