Show simple item record

contributor authorChengqing Wu
contributor authorHong Hao
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:15:22Z
date available2017-05-08T21:15:22Z
date copyrightDecember 2007
date issued2007
identifier other%28asce%290887-3828%282007%2921%3A6%28422%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44530
description abstractTerrorist bombing and accidental explosion may generate extreme loading conditions on nearby structures, resulting in damage and even collapse of structures. The degree of damage to a structure depends on the capacity of the detonation and its location as well as structural conditions. Some guidelines are available to assess the safety of unstrengthened buildings to airblast loads. These guidelines are usually given in terms of the safe scaled distance between explosion center and structure, whereas the structure conditions, which also affect its performance, are not explicitly defined. The safe scaled distance is obtained primarily from field blasting tests and experiences of structure damage to blast loads. These guidelines can be used for a quick safety assessment of structures, but do not provide clear damage scenarios of the structures. In a previous paper, damages of low-rise masonry infilled reinforced concrete (RC) structures to surface explosion of different scaled distances are numerically simulated. It was found that RC frame would collapse when the scaled distance was less than
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSafe Scaled Distance for Masonry Infilled RC Frame Structures Subjected to Airblast Loads
typeJournal Paper
journal volume21
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:6(422)
treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2007:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record