contributor author | Tarek M. Zayed | |
contributor author | Luh-Maan Chang | |
contributor author | Jon D. Fricker | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:14:58Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:14:58Z | |
date copyright | May 2002 | |
date issued | 2002 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290887-3828%282002%2916%3A2%2863%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44269 | |
description abstract | Life-cycle cost analysis is an essential approach to differentiating alternative rehabilitation strategies for steel bridge paint systems. An economic analysis (EA), which is a deterministic method, and the Markov decision process (MDP), which is a stochastic method, were used to carry out the life-cycle cost analysis. These analyses were applied to data from two state Departments of Transportation. The deterioration curves for steel bridge paint condition rating against age were constructed. Different rehabilitation scenarios were proposed for steel bridge paint. The EA and the MDP were used to analyze and differentiate among the proposed rehabilitation scenarios. The results of the EA were different from those of MDP for the two data sets. MDP favored the “do nothing” scenario until the end of paint life and then a complete repainting. EA indicated that the scenario “do spot repairs at state 3 of the paint life” and repeat that until the end of the bridge life was superior. The results were analyzed to determine the reason for the conflict. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Life-Cycle Cost Analysis using Deterministic and Stochastic Methods: Conflicting Results | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 16 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2002)16:2(63) | |
tree | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2002:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |