Show simple item record

contributor authorTarek M. Zayed
contributor authorLuh-Maan Chang
contributor authorJon D. Fricker
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:14:58Z
date available2017-05-08T21:14:58Z
date copyrightMay 2002
date issued2002
identifier other%28asce%290887-3828%282002%2916%3A2%2863%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44269
description abstractLife-cycle cost analysis is an essential approach to differentiating alternative rehabilitation strategies for steel bridge paint systems. An economic analysis (EA), which is a deterministic method, and the Markov decision process (MDP), which is a stochastic method, were used to carry out the life-cycle cost analysis. These analyses were applied to data from two state Departments of Transportation. The deterioration curves for steel bridge paint condition rating against age were constructed. Different rehabilitation scenarios were proposed for steel bridge paint. The EA and the MDP were used to analyze and differentiate among the proposed rehabilitation scenarios. The results of the EA were different from those of MDP for the two data sets. MDP favored the “do nothing” scenario until the end of paint life and then a complete repainting. EA indicated that the scenario “do spot repairs at state 3 of the paint life” and repeat that until the end of the bridge life was superior. The results were analyzed to determine the reason for the conflict.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLife-Cycle Cost Analysis using Deterministic and Stochastic Methods: Conflicting Results
typeJournal Paper
journal volume16
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2002)16:2(63)
treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2002:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record