contributor author | Piotr D. Moncarz | |
contributor author | Robert K. Taylor | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:14:54Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:14:54Z | |
date copyright | May 2000 | |
date issued | 2000 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290887-3828%282000%2914%3A2%2846%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44208 | |
description abstract | Was the collapse of the Hyatt hotel atrium walkway a senseless tragedy or a steppingstone in the betterment of the engineering and scientific endeavor? The collapse claimed 114 lives, leading to a great public and professional outcry and having a dramatic impact on the careers and lives of many fine professionals. The architecture and engineering (A&E) community in the United States began a soul-searching debate on issues as diverse as how project workflow is managed to professional responsibility and ethics. Fundamental errors were identified in the project interaction within the A&E group as well as the construction industry. This review provides a presentation of the demand-capacity ratio within elements primary to the failure and presents results of detailed inelastic analysis of the box girder-to-hanger rod connection. The collapse occurred simply because of the doubling of the load on the connection resulting from an ill-considered change of an ill-defined structural detail. How this error was produced, and how any minor additional effort might have substantially improved the connection capacity, is addressed herein. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Engineering Process Failure—Hyatt Walkway Collapse | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 14 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2000)14:2(46) | |
tree | Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2000:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |