Show simple item record

contributor authorPiotr D. Moncarz
contributor authorRobert K. Taylor
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:14:54Z
date available2017-05-08T21:14:54Z
date copyrightMay 2000
date issued2000
identifier other%28asce%290887-3828%282000%2914%3A2%2846%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/44208
description abstractWas the collapse of the Hyatt hotel atrium walkway a senseless tragedy or a steppingstone in the betterment of the engineering and scientific endeavor? The collapse claimed 114 lives, leading to a great public and professional outcry and having a dramatic impact on the careers and lives of many fine professionals. The architecture and engineering (A&E) community in the United States began a soul-searching debate on issues as diverse as how project workflow is managed to professional responsibility and ethics. Fundamental errors were identified in the project interaction within the A&E group as well as the construction industry. This review provides a presentation of the demand-capacity ratio within elements primary to the failure and presents results of detailed inelastic analysis of the box girder-to-hanger rod connection. The collapse occurred simply because of the doubling of the load on the connection resulting from an ill-considered change of an ill-defined structural detail. How this error was produced, and how any minor additional effort might have substantially improved the connection capacity, is addressed herein.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEngineering Process Failure—Hyatt Walkway Collapse
typeJournal Paper
journal volume14
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2000)14:2(46)
treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2000:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record