YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Pipeline–Soil Interaction Behavior: Acoustic Emission and Energy Dissipation

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002::page 04024157-1
    Author:
    Shijin Li
    ,
    Alister Smith
    DOI: 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12913
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Acoustic emission (AE) offers the potential to monitor and interpret soil–pipe interaction behavior by sensing particle-scale interactions. However, application of AE is limited by gaps in understanding related to how particle-scale interactions influence AE activity. Discrete element method (DEM) simulations of buried pipe uplift with energy tracking were performed and compared with experimental mechanical, displacement, and AE measurements, to ensure realistic behavior was captured by the modeling approach. A parametric investigation was then performed to evaluate the influence of pipe displacement direction and pipe diameter on plastic energy dissipation, and hence AE. Trends of dissipated plastic energy and measured AE with stress level (via burial depth) and pipe velocity were analogous. Relationships were quantified (R2 ranging from 0.74 to 0.98) between AE, dissipated plastic energy, and pipe velocity. Measured AE and dissipated plastic energy were linked with a general expression, comprising increments of friction (sliding and rolling), damping, and damage energies. Sliding friction energy accounted for >80% of the total dissipated energy on average during buried pipe deformation. Exemplar relationships were established between dissipated energy, pipe movement direction, embedment ratio, and mobilized soil volume (R2 values ranging from 0.92 to 0.97). A conceptual framework for interpreting buried pipe behavior using AE monitoring was presented.
    • Download: (12.78Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Pipeline–Soil Interaction Behavior: Acoustic Emission and Energy Dissipation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309472
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorShijin Li
    contributor authorAlister Smith
    date accessioned2026-02-16T21:36:55Z
    date available2026-02-16T21:36:55Z
    date copyright2025/02/01
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJGGEFK.GTENG-12913.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309472
    description abstractAcoustic emission (AE) offers the potential to monitor and interpret soil–pipe interaction behavior by sensing particle-scale interactions. However, application of AE is limited by gaps in understanding related to how particle-scale interactions influence AE activity. Discrete element method (DEM) simulations of buried pipe uplift with energy tracking were performed and compared with experimental mechanical, displacement, and AE measurements, to ensure realistic behavior was captured by the modeling approach. A parametric investigation was then performed to evaluate the influence of pipe displacement direction and pipe diameter on plastic energy dissipation, and hence AE. Trends of dissipated plastic energy and measured AE with stress level (via burial depth) and pipe velocity were analogous. Relationships were quantified (R2 ranging from 0.74 to 0.98) between AE, dissipated plastic energy, and pipe velocity. Measured AE and dissipated plastic energy were linked with a general expression, comprising increments of friction (sliding and rolling), damping, and damage energies. Sliding friction energy accounted for >80% of the total dissipated energy on average during buried pipe deformation. Exemplar relationships were established between dissipated energy, pipe movement direction, embedment ratio, and mobilized soil volume (R2 values ranging from 0.92 to 0.97). A conceptual framework for interpreting buried pipe behavior using AE monitoring was presented.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePipeline–Soil Interaction Behavior: Acoustic Emission and Energy Dissipation
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12913
    journal fristpage04024157-1
    journal lastpage04024157-21
    page21
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian