Pipeline–Soil Interaction Behavior: Acoustic Emission and Energy DissipationSource: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002::page 04024157-1DOI: 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12913Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Acoustic emission (AE) offers the potential to monitor and interpret soil–pipe interaction behavior by sensing particle-scale interactions. However, application of AE is limited by gaps in understanding related to how particle-scale interactions influence AE activity. Discrete element method (DEM) simulations of buried pipe uplift with energy tracking were performed and compared with experimental mechanical, displacement, and AE measurements, to ensure realistic behavior was captured by the modeling approach. A parametric investigation was then performed to evaluate the influence of pipe displacement direction and pipe diameter on plastic energy dissipation, and hence AE. Trends of dissipated plastic energy and measured AE with stress level (via burial depth) and pipe velocity were analogous. Relationships were quantified (R2 ranging from 0.74 to 0.98) between AE, dissipated plastic energy, and pipe velocity. Measured AE and dissipated plastic energy were linked with a general expression, comprising increments of friction (sliding and rolling), damping, and damage energies. Sliding friction energy accounted for >80% of the total dissipated energy on average during buried pipe deformation. Exemplar relationships were established between dissipated energy, pipe movement direction, embedment ratio, and mobilized soil volume (R2 values ranging from 0.92 to 0.97). A conceptual framework for interpreting buried pipe behavior using AE monitoring was presented.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Shijin Li | |
| contributor author | Alister Smith | |
| date accessioned | 2026-02-16T21:36:55Z | |
| date available | 2026-02-16T21:36:55Z | |
| date copyright | 2025/02/01 | |
| date issued | 2025 | |
| identifier other | JGGEFK.GTENG-12913.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309472 | |
| description abstract | Acoustic emission (AE) offers the potential to monitor and interpret soil–pipe interaction behavior by sensing particle-scale interactions. However, application of AE is limited by gaps in understanding related to how particle-scale interactions influence AE activity. Discrete element method (DEM) simulations of buried pipe uplift with energy tracking were performed and compared with experimental mechanical, displacement, and AE measurements, to ensure realistic behavior was captured by the modeling approach. A parametric investigation was then performed to evaluate the influence of pipe displacement direction and pipe diameter on plastic energy dissipation, and hence AE. Trends of dissipated plastic energy and measured AE with stress level (via burial depth) and pipe velocity were analogous. Relationships were quantified (R2 ranging from 0.74 to 0.98) between AE, dissipated plastic energy, and pipe velocity. Measured AE and dissipated plastic energy were linked with a general expression, comprising increments of friction (sliding and rolling), damping, and damage energies. Sliding friction energy accounted for >80% of the total dissipated energy on average during buried pipe deformation. Exemplar relationships were established between dissipated energy, pipe movement direction, embedment ratio, and mobilized soil volume (R2 values ranging from 0.92 to 0.97). A conceptual framework for interpreting buried pipe behavior using AE monitoring was presented. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Pipeline–Soil Interaction Behavior: Acoustic Emission and Energy Dissipation | |
| type | Journal Article | |
| journal volume | 151 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12913 | |
| journal fristpage | 04024157-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 04024157-21 | |
| page | 21 | |
| tree | Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |