YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Mixed Uncertainty Analysis in Pressure Systems Inspection Applications

    Source: ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2025:;volume( 011 ):;issue: 002::page 21105-1
    Author:
    Brown, Conal H.
    ,
    Ferson, Scott
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4068152
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Pressure systems contain hazardous fluids within industrial processes. Inspection plays a vital role in managing the reliability of these safety-critical systems. It allows engineers to identify, characterize, and manage degradation of pressure vessels, piping, and associated equipment to prevent failure and the associated consequences on people and the environment. Mixed uncertainty can affect decision-making in at least three distinct aspects of inspection practice: inspection planning, inspection data analysis, and integrity assessment. Despite this, the inspection engineering discipline lacks methodologies for handling both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties within analyses, which could be expensively misleading. This paper demonstrates the benefits of applying mixed uncertainty quantification and analysis techniques to pressure vessel inspection and integrity assessment through a worked example, which shows how the epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in inspection data can be represented using an imprecise probability approach. The limitations of empirical data are shown to pose challenges to implementing these techniques in practice, and so practical requirements for a framework for implementing uncertainty analysis methods in inspection are proposed. These include, for example, the ability to generate meaningful yet conservative results from even a limited amount of poor-quality data, while allowing results to be bounded more narrowly as more data is collected, findings from better data are pooled, or engineering judgment and assumptions are applied.
    • Download: (2.039Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Mixed Uncertainty Analysis in Pressure Systems Inspection Applications

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4308086
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrown, Conal H.
    contributor authorFerson, Scott
    date accessioned2025-08-20T09:19:26Z
    date available2025-08-20T09:19:26Z
    date copyright4/7/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier issn2332-9017
    identifier otherrisk_011_02_021105.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4308086
    description abstractPressure systems contain hazardous fluids within industrial processes. Inspection plays a vital role in managing the reliability of these safety-critical systems. It allows engineers to identify, characterize, and manage degradation of pressure vessels, piping, and associated equipment to prevent failure and the associated consequences on people and the environment. Mixed uncertainty can affect decision-making in at least three distinct aspects of inspection practice: inspection planning, inspection data analysis, and integrity assessment. Despite this, the inspection engineering discipline lacks methodologies for handling both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties within analyses, which could be expensively misleading. This paper demonstrates the benefits of applying mixed uncertainty quantification and analysis techniques to pressure vessel inspection and integrity assessment through a worked example, which shows how the epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in inspection data can be represented using an imprecise probability approach. The limitations of empirical data are shown to pose challenges to implementing these techniques in practice, and so practical requirements for a framework for implementing uncertainty analysis methods in inspection are proposed. These include, for example, the ability to generate meaningful yet conservative results from even a limited amount of poor-quality data, while allowing results to be bounded more narrowly as more data is collected, findings from better data are pooled, or engineering judgment and assumptions are applied.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMixed Uncertainty Analysis in Pressure Systems Inspection Applications
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume11
    journal issue2
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4068152
    journal fristpage21105-1
    journal lastpage21105-14
    page14
    treeASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2025:;volume( 011 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian