YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation and Proposal of Strut-and-Tie Method for the Design of Drilled Shaft Footings

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 007::page 04025080-1
    Author:
    Yousun Yi
    ,
    Hyunsu Kim
    ,
    Jongkwon Choi
    ,
    Juan Murcia-Delso
    ,
    Trevor D. Hrynyk
    ,
    Oguzhan Bayrak
    DOI: 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13976
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper presents a practical, accurate, and reasonably conservative procedure for the design and analysis of drilled shaft footings, also referred to as pile caps. A database of drilled shaft footing tests was compiled from the literature to evaluate the accuracy of an existing design guide based on the three-dimensional (3D) strut-and-tie method (STM). It was concluded that strength estimations obtained with the existing 3D STM-based design guidelines were excessively conservative, and the accuracy of the method varied with key design parameters such as strut inclination and drilled shaft size. Key enhancements to the 3D STM are proposed to resolve existing limitations and ambiguities, including the definition of tie area for bottom mat reinforcement, 3D nodal geometry, nodal strength, concrete efficiency factor, and tie anchorage checks. These recommendations are supported by experimental evidence, including data from large-scale footing tests recently conducted by the authors, and are consistent with current design code provisions. The proposed method provides more accurate (less conservative) and less scattered (more reliable) strength estimations as compared to the existing recommendation. Lastly, a complete design example of a drilled shaft footing subjected to different loading scenarios is provided in the Supplemental Materials.
    • Download: (2.237Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation and Proposal of Strut-and-Tie Method for the Design of Drilled Shaft Footings

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306748
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYousun Yi
    contributor authorHyunsu Kim
    contributor authorJongkwon Choi
    contributor authorJuan Murcia-Delso
    contributor authorTrevor D. Hrynyk
    contributor authorOguzhan Bayrak
    date accessioned2025-08-17T22:18:37Z
    date available2025-08-17T22:18:37Z
    date copyright7/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherJSENDH.STENG-13976.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306748
    description abstractThis paper presents a practical, accurate, and reasonably conservative procedure for the design and analysis of drilled shaft footings, also referred to as pile caps. A database of drilled shaft footing tests was compiled from the literature to evaluate the accuracy of an existing design guide based on the three-dimensional (3D) strut-and-tie method (STM). It was concluded that strength estimations obtained with the existing 3D STM-based design guidelines were excessively conservative, and the accuracy of the method varied with key design parameters such as strut inclination and drilled shaft size. Key enhancements to the 3D STM are proposed to resolve existing limitations and ambiguities, including the definition of tie area for bottom mat reinforcement, 3D nodal geometry, nodal strength, concrete efficiency factor, and tie anchorage checks. These recommendations are supported by experimental evidence, including data from large-scale footing tests recently conducted by the authors, and are consistent with current design code provisions. The proposed method provides more accurate (less conservative) and less scattered (more reliable) strength estimations as compared to the existing recommendation. Lastly, a complete design example of a drilled shaft footing subjected to different loading scenarios is provided in the Supplemental Materials.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEvaluation and Proposal of Strut-and-Tie Method for the Design of Drilled Shaft Footings
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume151
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13976
    journal fristpage04025080-1
    journal lastpage04025080-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian