Show simple item record

contributor authorTatli, Akif Eren
contributor authorYou, Dongchuan
contributor authorMetghalchi, Hameed
date accessioned2025-04-21T10:21:52Z
date available2025-04-21T10:21:52Z
date copyright10/11/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2024
identifier issn2770-3495
identifier otheraoje_3_031026.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306029
description abstractSupercritical carbon dioxide power cycles are getting more attention every day due to their high efficiencies. This study has examined determination of split ratio and intermediate pressure for maximum efficiency in various supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycle configurations. Five cycle variants have been analyzed: reheating, partial cooling, partial cooling with reheating, intercooling, and intercooling with reheating. Partial derivatives of efficiency with respect to split ratio and intermediate pressure have been determined and set equal to zero to find optimum split ratio and intermediate pressure. This process has isolated the system's response to these two key parameters while keeping other cycle variables constant. Across all configurations, following parameters have been fixed: inlet temperatures of 550 °C and 32 °C for turbine and compressor components, an energy source temperature of 600 °C, an ambient temperature of 27 °C, and pressure limits of 75 bar and 200 bar. Optimization results show that recompression–reheating cycle achieves the highest efficiency of 39.62% at an optimum intermediate pressure of 139.43 bar and a split ratio of 71.1%. Recompression–partial cooling cycle exhibits the lowest maximum efficiency at 37.35%, with an optimum intermediate pressure of 85.87 bar and a split ratio of 62.6%. Recompression–partial cooling with reheating cycle reaches a maximum efficiency of 37.98% at an optimum intermediate pressure of 123.94 bar and a split ratio of 67.2%, while the intercooling cycle and intercooling with reheating cycle attain 39.57% at an optimum intermediate pressure of 80.03 bar and a split ratio of 66.4% and 39.59% at an optimum intermediate pressure of 116.1 bar and a split ratio of 69.2%, respectively. Additionally, exergy destruction has been calculated for all components of the system and it is related to thermal efficiency of the cycle.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleOptimizing Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycles Performance With Respect to Split Ratio and Intermediate Pressure
typeJournal Paper
journal volume3
journal titleASME Open Journal of Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4066683
journal fristpage31026-1
journal lastpage31026-10
page10
treeASME Open Journal of Engineering:;2024:;volume( 003 )
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record