On the Consistent Classification and Treatment of Uncertainties in Structural Health Monitoring ApplicationsSource: ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2024:;volume( 011 ):;issue: 001::page 11108-1Author:Kamariotis, Antonios
,
Vlachas, Konstantinos
,
Ntertimanis, Vasileios
,
Koune, Ioannis
,
Cicirello, Alice
,
Chatzi, Eleni
DOI: 10.1115/1.4067140Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In this paper, we provide a comprehensive definition and classification of various sources of uncertainty within the fields of structural dynamics, system identification, and structural health monitoring (SHM), with a primary focus on the latter. Utilizing the classical input–output system representation as a main contextual framework, we present a taxonomy of uncertainties, intended for consistent classification of uncertainties in SHM applications: (i) input uncertainty; (ii) model form uncertainty; (iii) model parameter/variable uncertainty; (iv) measurement uncertainty; and (v) inherent variability. We then critically review methods and algorithms that address these uncertainties in the context of key SHM tasks: system identification and model inference, model updating, accounting for environmental and operational variability (EOV), virtual sensing, damage identification, and prognostic health management. A benchmark shear frame model with hysteretic links is employed as a running example to illustrate the application of selected methods and algorithmic tools. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future research directions in uncertainty quantification for SHM.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Kamariotis, Antonios | |
contributor author | Vlachas, Konstantinos | |
contributor author | Ntertimanis, Vasileios | |
contributor author | Koune, Ioannis | |
contributor author | Cicirello, Alice | |
contributor author | Chatzi, Eleni | |
date accessioned | 2025-04-21T10:11:28Z | |
date available | 2025-04-21T10:11:28Z | |
date copyright | 12/9/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2024 | |
identifier issn | 2332-9017 | |
identifier other | risk_011_01_011108.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305677 | |
description abstract | In this paper, we provide a comprehensive definition and classification of various sources of uncertainty within the fields of structural dynamics, system identification, and structural health monitoring (SHM), with a primary focus on the latter. Utilizing the classical input–output system representation as a main contextual framework, we present a taxonomy of uncertainties, intended for consistent classification of uncertainties in SHM applications: (i) input uncertainty; (ii) model form uncertainty; (iii) model parameter/variable uncertainty; (iv) measurement uncertainty; and (v) inherent variability. We then critically review methods and algorithms that address these uncertainties in the context of key SHM tasks: system identification and model inference, model updating, accounting for environmental and operational variability (EOV), virtual sensing, damage identification, and prognostic health management. A benchmark shear frame model with hysteretic links is employed as a running example to illustrate the application of selected methods and algorithmic tools. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future research directions in uncertainty quantification for SHM. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | On the Consistent Classification and Treatment of Uncertainties in Structural Health Monitoring Applications | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 11 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4067140 | |
journal fristpage | 11108-1 | |
journal lastpage | 11108-21 | |
page | 21 | |
tree | ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2024:;volume( 011 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |