YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    On the Consistent Classification and Treatment of Uncertainties in Structural Health Monitoring Applications

    Source: ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2024:;volume( 011 ):;issue: 001::page 11108-1
    Author:
    Kamariotis, Antonios
    ,
    Vlachas, Konstantinos
    ,
    Ntertimanis, Vasileios
    ,
    Koune, Ioannis
    ,
    Cicirello, Alice
    ,
    Chatzi, Eleni
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4067140
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In this paper, we provide a comprehensive definition and classification of various sources of uncertainty within the fields of structural dynamics, system identification, and structural health monitoring (SHM), with a primary focus on the latter. Utilizing the classical input–output system representation as a main contextual framework, we present a taxonomy of uncertainties, intended for consistent classification of uncertainties in SHM applications: (i) input uncertainty; (ii) model form uncertainty; (iii) model parameter/variable uncertainty; (iv) measurement uncertainty; and (v) inherent variability. We then critically review methods and algorithms that address these uncertainties in the context of key SHM tasks: system identification and model inference, model updating, accounting for environmental and operational variability (EOV), virtual sensing, damage identification, and prognostic health management. A benchmark shear frame model with hysteretic links is employed as a running example to illustrate the application of selected methods and algorithmic tools. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future research directions in uncertainty quantification for SHM.
    • Download: (4.054Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      On the Consistent Classification and Treatment of Uncertainties in Structural Health Monitoring Applications

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305677
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKamariotis, Antonios
    contributor authorVlachas, Konstantinos
    contributor authorNtertimanis, Vasileios
    contributor authorKoune, Ioannis
    contributor authorCicirello, Alice
    contributor authorChatzi, Eleni
    date accessioned2025-04-21T10:11:28Z
    date available2025-04-21T10:11:28Z
    date copyright12/9/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier issn2332-9017
    identifier otherrisk_011_01_011108.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305677
    description abstractIn this paper, we provide a comprehensive definition and classification of various sources of uncertainty within the fields of structural dynamics, system identification, and structural health monitoring (SHM), with a primary focus on the latter. Utilizing the classical input–output system representation as a main contextual framework, we present a taxonomy of uncertainties, intended for consistent classification of uncertainties in SHM applications: (i) input uncertainty; (ii) model form uncertainty; (iii) model parameter/variable uncertainty; (iv) measurement uncertainty; and (v) inherent variability. We then critically review methods and algorithms that address these uncertainties in the context of key SHM tasks: system identification and model inference, model updating, accounting for environmental and operational variability (EOV), virtual sensing, damage identification, and prognostic health management. A benchmark shear frame model with hysteretic links is employed as a running example to illustrate the application of selected methods and algorithmic tools. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future research directions in uncertainty quantification for SHM.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleOn the Consistent Classification and Treatment of Uncertainties in Structural Health Monitoring Applications
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume11
    journal issue1
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4067140
    journal fristpage11108-1
    journal lastpage11108-21
    page21
    treeASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2024:;volume( 011 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian