YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of Leading-Edge Blowing Control and Reduced Frequency on Airfoil Aerodynamic Performances

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 010::page 101302-1
    Author:
    Chen, Yang
    ,
    Avital, Eldad
    ,
    Willams, John
    ,
    Santra, Srimanta
    ,
    Seifert, Avraham
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4065294
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Airfoil leading-edge fluid-blowing control is computationally studied to improve aerodynamic efficiency. The fluid injection momentum coefficient Cμ (the ratio of injection to incoming square velocities times the slot's width to airfoil's half chord length) varies from 0.5% to 5.4%. Both static and dynamic conditions are investigated for a NACA0018 airfoil at low speed and Reynolds number of 250 k based on the airfoil's chord length. The airfoil is dynamically pitched at a reduced frequency (the pitching tangential speed to the freestream speed ratio), varying between 0.0078 and 0.2. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and unsteady RANS (URANS) is used in the simulations as based on the Transition SST and Spalart–Allmaras models, generally achieving good agreement with experimental results in lift and drag coefficients and in the pressure coefficient distributions along the airfoil. It is found that oscillating the airfoil can delay stall, as expected, in dynamic stall (DS). Leading-edge blowing control can also significantly delay stall both in static and dynamic conditions as long as sufficient momentum is applied to the control. On the other hand, for a small Cμ such as 0.5%, the leading-edge control worsens the performance and hastens the appearance of stall in both static and dynamic conditions. The airfoil's oscillation reduces the differences between pitch-up and pitch-down aerodynamic performances. Detailed analysis of vorticity, pressure, velocity, and streamline contours is given to provide plausible explanations and insight to the flow.
    • Download: (6.774Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of Leading-Edge Blowing Control and Reduced Frequency on Airfoil Aerodynamic Performances

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305535
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChen, Yang
    contributor authorAvital, Eldad
    contributor authorWillams, John
    contributor authorSantra, Srimanta
    contributor authorSeifert, Avraham
    date accessioned2025-04-21T10:07:13Z
    date available2025-04-21T10:07:13Z
    date copyright5/3/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_146_10_101302.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305535
    description abstractAirfoil leading-edge fluid-blowing control is computationally studied to improve aerodynamic efficiency. The fluid injection momentum coefficient Cμ (the ratio of injection to incoming square velocities times the slot's width to airfoil's half chord length) varies from 0.5% to 5.4%. Both static and dynamic conditions are investigated for a NACA0018 airfoil at low speed and Reynolds number of 250 k based on the airfoil's chord length. The airfoil is dynamically pitched at a reduced frequency (the pitching tangential speed to the freestream speed ratio), varying between 0.0078 and 0.2. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and unsteady RANS (URANS) is used in the simulations as based on the Transition SST and Spalart–Allmaras models, generally achieving good agreement with experimental results in lift and drag coefficients and in the pressure coefficient distributions along the airfoil. It is found that oscillating the airfoil can delay stall, as expected, in dynamic stall (DS). Leading-edge blowing control can also significantly delay stall both in static and dynamic conditions as long as sufficient momentum is applied to the control. On the other hand, for a small Cμ such as 0.5%, the leading-edge control worsens the performance and hastens the appearance of stall in both static and dynamic conditions. The airfoil's oscillation reduces the differences between pitch-up and pitch-down aerodynamic performances. Detailed analysis of vorticity, pressure, velocity, and streamline contours is given to provide plausible explanations and insight to the flow.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEffects of Leading-Edge Blowing Control and Reduced Frequency on Airfoil Aerodynamic Performances
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4065294
    journal fristpage101302-1
    journal lastpage101302-16
    page16
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian