YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Gaussian Process Regression–Based Model Error Diagnosis and Quantification Using Experimental Data of Prestressed Concrete Beams in Shear

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001::page 04024095-1
    Author:
    Jiadaren Liu
    ,
    John Alexander
    ,
    Yong Li
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1455
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: To facilitate considering model uncertainty for rigorous reliability/probabilistic analysis, this paper proposed a Gaussian process regression–based (GPR-based) model error quantification framework and applied to shear capacity prediction of prestressed concrete (PC) beams. Firstly, the model error of shear capacity models from five well-received concrete structure and bridge design codes were diagnosed based on a compiled experimental database, where systematic correlations between model error and model parameters were observed. To consider the systematic correlation, model error was then calibrated as a function of model parameters based on GPR. Different covariance functions were considered, and a model selection was conducted based on 10-fold cross validations. Then, the model error quantification performance was evaluated by investigating the residual systematic correlation between model error and model parameters, as well as by comparisons with the traditional professional factor approach. In the end, relative importance of model parameters on the model error for each design code were analyzed, indicating that the shear span-to-effective depth ratio is the most important source of model error for all considered design code models.
    • Download: (1.400Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Gaussian Process Regression–Based Model Error Diagnosis and Quantification Using Experimental Data of Prestressed Concrete Beams in Shear

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304690
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJiadaren Liu
    contributor authorJohn Alexander
    contributor authorYong Li
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:25:20Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:25:20Z
    date copyright12/24/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherAJRUA6.RUENG-1455.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304690
    description abstractTo facilitate considering model uncertainty for rigorous reliability/probabilistic analysis, this paper proposed a Gaussian process regression–based (GPR-based) model error quantification framework and applied to shear capacity prediction of prestressed concrete (PC) beams. Firstly, the model error of shear capacity models from five well-received concrete structure and bridge design codes were diagnosed based on a compiled experimental database, where systematic correlations between model error and model parameters were observed. To consider the systematic correlation, model error was then calibrated as a function of model parameters based on GPR. Different covariance functions were considered, and a model selection was conducted based on 10-fold cross validations. Then, the model error quantification performance was evaluated by investigating the residual systematic correlation between model error and model parameters, as well as by comparisons with the traditional professional factor approach. In the end, relative importance of model parameters on the model error for each design code were analyzed, indicating that the shear span-to-effective depth ratio is the most important source of model error for all considered design code models.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleGaussian Process Regression–Based Model Error Diagnosis and Quantification Using Experimental Data of Prestressed Concrete Beams in Shear
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume11
    journal issue1
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1455
    journal fristpage04024095-1
    journal lastpage04024095-11
    page11
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian