YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Robustness of Urban Rail Transit Networks Considering Cascade Failure under Attacks: A Case Study of Nanjing, China

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001::page 04024093-1
    Author:
    Zhuanglin Ma
    ,
    Dawei Hu
    ,
    Steven I-Jy Chien
    ,
    Jie Liu
    ,
    Yue Liu
    ,
    Ke Wu
    DOI: 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1324
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Urban rail transit (URT) has become one of the main carriers to undertake passenger transportation tasks in large and medium-sized cities. However, station failures can reduce the efficiency of passenger travel and the transport capacity of the entire network. This paper constructs an urban rail transit network (URTN) topology model based on complex network theory and builds a cascade failure model considering load redistribution, five attack strategies, and three load distribution strategies. Then, the transport capacity is taken as a comprehensive metric of network robustness and the effects of different attack strategies, different load distribution strategies, and different parameter values on the robustness of URTN are compared. Finally, the Nanjing rail transit network is used as the case study. The Intentional Attack (IA) strategy is more destructive to the transport capacity than the Random Attack strategy. The network robustness under the Static Intentional Attack (SIA) strategy is weaker than that of the Dynamic Intentional Attack (DIA) strategy. Given different load distribution strategies, the levels of network damage based on the station degree and the betweenness of the attack strategy are different. The residual capacity load distribution strategy can significantly improve the robustness of the network. The robustness of the network can be improved by adjusting the coefficient of the capacity regulation and passenger transfer rate and can be optimized when the coefficient of capacity regulation is in the interval of [0.6, 0.8] and the passenger transfer rate is in the interval of [0.3, 0.4]. The proposed methods can be applied to assess the robustness of an URTN and offer operators an alternative to formulate safety operational management strategies.
    • Download: (655.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Robustness of Urban Rail Transit Networks Considering Cascade Failure under Attacks: A Case Study of Nanjing, China

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303859
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZhuanglin Ma
    contributor authorDawei Hu
    contributor authorSteven I-Jy Chien
    contributor authorJie Liu
    contributor authorYue Liu
    contributor authorKe Wu
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:01:39Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:01:39Z
    date copyright12/19/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier otherAJRUA6.RUENG-1324.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303859
    description abstractUrban rail transit (URT) has become one of the main carriers to undertake passenger transportation tasks in large and medium-sized cities. However, station failures can reduce the efficiency of passenger travel and the transport capacity of the entire network. This paper constructs an urban rail transit network (URTN) topology model based on complex network theory and builds a cascade failure model considering load redistribution, five attack strategies, and three load distribution strategies. Then, the transport capacity is taken as a comprehensive metric of network robustness and the effects of different attack strategies, different load distribution strategies, and different parameter values on the robustness of URTN are compared. Finally, the Nanjing rail transit network is used as the case study. The Intentional Attack (IA) strategy is more destructive to the transport capacity than the Random Attack strategy. The network robustness under the Static Intentional Attack (SIA) strategy is weaker than that of the Dynamic Intentional Attack (DIA) strategy. Given different load distribution strategies, the levels of network damage based on the station degree and the betweenness of the attack strategy are different. The residual capacity load distribution strategy can significantly improve the robustness of the network. The robustness of the network can be improved by adjusting the coefficient of the capacity regulation and passenger transfer rate and can be optimized when the coefficient of capacity regulation is in the interval of [0.6, 0.8] and the passenger transfer rate is in the interval of [0.3, 0.4]. The proposed methods can be applied to assess the robustness of an URTN and offer operators an alternative to formulate safety operational management strategies.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRobustness of Urban Rail Transit Networks Considering Cascade Failure under Attacks: A Case Study of Nanjing, China
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume11
    journal issue1
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1324
    journal fristpage04024093-1
    journal lastpage04024093-11
    page11
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 011 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian