YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance of Borated Centrifugally Tensioned Metastable Fluid Detector Versus Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection With the Source Within Lead/Concrete Shielded Configurations

    Source: Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2024:;volume( 010 ):;issue: 004::page 42002-1
    Author:
    Ota, Yusuke
    ,
    Taleyarkhan, Rusi P.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4065853
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper presents the results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (B-CTMFD) configured to detect thermal to fast neutrons versus two widely used neutron detection devices of similar form factors: moderated He-3 based Ludlum-42-49B neutron detector, and, the Fuji Electric's NSN3TM (NNSN3) pressurized nitrogen-methane filled neutron detector. The one-on-one performance comparisons were conducted using soft (Cf-252 fission) neutron spectrum isotope neutron sources positioned behind various levels of lead and concrete shielding ranging in thickness from 0 cm (unshielded) to up to 30 cm. The comparisons were conducted with Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code (MCNP) code simulations to account for three-dimensional effects and to relate the absolute detection rate with the dose rate—to derive the sensitivity factor (cpm/μSv/h). While the Ludlum 42-49B and NSN3 detectors operate at a fixed sensitivity setting, the centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (CTMFD) can be (and was) operated to detect and separate the contributions from epithermal (0.02 eV–0.2 MeV) and from fast (>0.2 MeV) neutrons at various sensitivity levels by varying the tensioned metastable negative pressure (Pneg) from 0.3 MPa to 0.7 MPa. The B-CTMFD (configured for detecting the full 0.02 eV to 12 MeV neutrons >0.1 MeV neutron detection at Pneg = 0.7 MPa) offered relative sensitivity enhancements of up to ∼22× greater than Ludlum and over 5× greater than NSN3, over the 0-15 cm range of Pb shielding, and the 0–30 cm concrete shield thickness. The contribution from detecting down scattered neutrons increases with increased thickness, especially for concrete shielding. The B-CTMFD design overcomes the detection penalty (up to 60% depending on shielding type and thickness) inherent in the nonborated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (NB-CTMFD), designed only to detect fast-energy neutrons—as described in the companion (Part-1) paper. However, unlike the NB-CTMFD, which used 100% decafluorapentane (DFP) (C5H2F10), the B-CTMFD requires the use of an azeotropic mixture of DFP, methanol, and tri-methyl borate (TMB—C3H9BO3, using natural boron) in 80:4:16 proportion. The B-CTMFD was about 6 times more sensitive than NB-CTMFD under the most heavily shielded condition and, taken together, also offered 2-energy bin neutron spectroscopic enablement, together with 22-5× higher absolute efficiency and relative sensitivity compared with the nonspectroscopic Ludlum (He-3) and NSN3 (methane-nitrogen) based detectors. From an intrinsic efficiency standpoint, the B-CTMFD operating at Pneg = 0.7 MPa state demonstrated ∼103× higher intrinsic efficiency over Ludlum 42-49B and NSN3 detectors, respectively.
    • Download: (2.160Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance of Borated Centrifugally Tensioned Metastable Fluid Detector Versus Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection With the Source Within Lead/Concrete Shielded Configurations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303615
    Collections
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science

    Show full item record

    contributor authorOta, Yusuke
    contributor authorTaleyarkhan, Rusi P.
    date accessioned2024-12-24T19:16:01Z
    date available2024-12-24T19:16:01Z
    date copyright7/16/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier issn2332-8983
    identifier otherners_010_04_042002.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303615
    description abstractThis paper presents the results of neutron detection efficiency and dosimetry between a borated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (B-CTMFD) configured to detect thermal to fast neutrons versus two widely used neutron detection devices of similar form factors: moderated He-3 based Ludlum-42-49B neutron detector, and, the Fuji Electric's NSN3TM (NNSN3) pressurized nitrogen-methane filled neutron detector. The one-on-one performance comparisons were conducted using soft (Cf-252 fission) neutron spectrum isotope neutron sources positioned behind various levels of lead and concrete shielding ranging in thickness from 0 cm (unshielded) to up to 30 cm. The comparisons were conducted with Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code (MCNP) code simulations to account for three-dimensional effects and to relate the absolute detection rate with the dose rate—to derive the sensitivity factor (cpm/μSv/h). While the Ludlum 42-49B and NSN3 detectors operate at a fixed sensitivity setting, the centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (CTMFD) can be (and was) operated to detect and separate the contributions from epithermal (0.02 eV–0.2 MeV) and from fast (>0.2 MeV) neutrons at various sensitivity levels by varying the tensioned metastable negative pressure (Pneg) from 0.3 MPa to 0.7 MPa. The B-CTMFD (configured for detecting the full 0.02 eV to 12 MeV neutrons >0.1 MeV neutron detection at Pneg = 0.7 MPa) offered relative sensitivity enhancements of up to ∼22× greater than Ludlum and over 5× greater than NSN3, over the 0-15 cm range of Pb shielding, and the 0–30 cm concrete shield thickness. The contribution from detecting down scattered neutrons increases with increased thickness, especially for concrete shielding. The B-CTMFD design overcomes the detection penalty (up to 60% depending on shielding type and thickness) inherent in the nonborated centrifugally tensioned metastable fluid detector (NB-CTMFD), designed only to detect fast-energy neutrons—as described in the companion (Part-1) paper. However, unlike the NB-CTMFD, which used 100% decafluorapentane (DFP) (C5H2F10), the B-CTMFD requires the use of an azeotropic mixture of DFP, methanol, and tri-methyl borate (TMB—C3H9BO3, using natural boron) in 80:4:16 proportion. The B-CTMFD was about 6 times more sensitive than NB-CTMFD under the most heavily shielded condition and, taken together, also offered 2-energy bin neutron spectroscopic enablement, together with 22-5× higher absolute efficiency and relative sensitivity compared with the nonspectroscopic Ludlum (He-3) and NSN3 (methane-nitrogen) based detectors. From an intrinsic efficiency standpoint, the B-CTMFD operating at Pneg = 0.7 MPa state demonstrated ∼103× higher intrinsic efficiency over Ludlum 42-49B and NSN3 detectors, respectively.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePerformance of Borated Centrifugally Tensioned Metastable Fluid Detector Versus Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection With the Source Within Lead/Concrete Shielded Configurations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume10
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4065853
    journal fristpage42002-1
    journal lastpage42002-9
    page9
    treeJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2024:;volume( 010 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian