Show simple item record

contributor authorSchmid, Abigail C.
contributor authorAndrews, Stephen A.
date accessioned2024-12-24T18:46:28Z
date available2024-12-24T18:46:28Z
date copyright5/13/2024 12:00:00 AM
date issued2024
identifier issn2377-2158
identifier othervvuq_009_01_011003.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4302723
description abstractThe Davis equation of state (EOS) is commonly used to model thermodynamic relationships for high explosive (HE) reactants. Typically, the parameters in the EOS are calibrated, with uncertainty, using a Bayesian framework and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. However, MCMC methods are computationally expensive, especially for complex models with many parameters. This paper provides a comparison between MCMC and less computationally expensive Variational methods (Variational Bayesian and Hessian Variational Bayesian) for computing the posterior distribution and approximating the posterior covariance matrix based on heterogeneous experimental data. All three methods recover similar posterior distributions and posterior covariance matrices. This study demonstrates that for this EOS parameter calibration application, the assumptions made in the two Variational methods significantly reduce the computational cost but do not substantially change the results compared to MCMC.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titlePosterior Covariance Matrix Approximations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume9
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
identifier doi10.1115/1.4065378
journal fristpage11003-1
journal lastpage11003-10
page10
treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2024:;volume( 009 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record