YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Wildfire Ash Composition and Engineering Behavior

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 008::page 04024067-1
    Author:
    Xenia Wirth
    ,
    Vanessa Antunez
    ,
    Dezire Enriquez
    ,
    Zuleyma Arevalo
    ,
    Ramzieh Kanaan
    DOI: 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11683
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: After a wildfire event, ash is a newly formed surficial soil layer with microscale properties such as roughness, morphology, and chemical composition that may impact how ashes form fabrics in situ and so affect the overall hydrological conditions of a burned area (infiltration capacity, permeability, etc.). To examine the effects of ash microscale properties on macroscale behavior, eight wildfire ash samples from California were characterized physically (specific gravity, specific surface area, particle size, etc.), chemically (elemental composition, organic and inorganic carbon content, etc.), and geotechnically (strength, compaction, saturated hydraulic conductivity, etc.). The tested ashes were found to contain predominantly organic unburned carbons and carbonates derived from the combustion of calcium-oxalate rich fuels in temperatures likely ranging from 300°C to 500°C. Ashes had high specific surface areas because morphologically, particles had highly texturized and porous surfaces. Additional water was necessary to coat the particle surfaces, which led to high liquid limits and compaction optimum moisture contents. Hydraulic conductivity values were within range for silty sands (10−5–10−3  cm/s), and specimens had friction angles near 30°. However, tested ashes consistently demonstrated high void ratios and low bulk densities during testing for strength, hydraulic conductivity, and compaction. These anomalies were attributed to unusual carbonate morphologies; the high interparticle friction of these phases allowed ashes to form looser fabrics than a typical silty sand and contributed to the measured high void ratios, low maximum dry unit weights, and high friction angles. Overall, we hypothesize that the relative amounts of inorganic versus organic constituents in our wildfire ash samples affected how the ashes formed fabrics and so affected their geotechnical properties. The role of wildfire ash in the postfire hydrological response of a catchment is not perfectly understood. Ash is a very heterogenous material whose properties are directly related to its formation environment (fuel type and accessibility, fire duration, and fire temperature, to name a few). This newly formed surface soil layer has unusual properties compared to natural soils, including low bulk densities and high porosities (sometimes up to 70% or more) in situ, but there is currently not enough information on ash properties in the literature to fully explain why. This study addresses this gap by providing physical, chemical, and geotechnical information about wildfire ashes. This is one of the first studies to specifically test wildfire ash maximum density, Atterberg limits, and shear strength. It provides geotechnical data to the community as well as information about ash chemical and physical properties. We hope that this study not only supplements the current literature on postwildfire landscapes but also informs researchers, engineers, and policy makers about how the formation environment of ash can influence its engineering behavior, such as strength, compressibility, and permeability.
    • Download: (3.438Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Wildfire Ash Composition and Engineering Behavior

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298925
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorXenia Wirth
    contributor authorVanessa Antunez
    contributor authorDezire Enriquez
    contributor authorZuleyma Arevalo
    contributor authorRamzieh Kanaan
    date accessioned2024-12-24T10:26:29Z
    date available2024-12-24T10:26:29Z
    date copyright8/1/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherJGGEFK.GTENG-11683.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298925
    description abstractAfter a wildfire event, ash is a newly formed surficial soil layer with microscale properties such as roughness, morphology, and chemical composition that may impact how ashes form fabrics in situ and so affect the overall hydrological conditions of a burned area (infiltration capacity, permeability, etc.). To examine the effects of ash microscale properties on macroscale behavior, eight wildfire ash samples from California were characterized physically (specific gravity, specific surface area, particle size, etc.), chemically (elemental composition, organic and inorganic carbon content, etc.), and geotechnically (strength, compaction, saturated hydraulic conductivity, etc.). The tested ashes were found to contain predominantly organic unburned carbons and carbonates derived from the combustion of calcium-oxalate rich fuels in temperatures likely ranging from 300°C to 500°C. Ashes had high specific surface areas because morphologically, particles had highly texturized and porous surfaces. Additional water was necessary to coat the particle surfaces, which led to high liquid limits and compaction optimum moisture contents. Hydraulic conductivity values were within range for silty sands (10−5–10−3  cm/s), and specimens had friction angles near 30°. However, tested ashes consistently demonstrated high void ratios and low bulk densities during testing for strength, hydraulic conductivity, and compaction. These anomalies were attributed to unusual carbonate morphologies; the high interparticle friction of these phases allowed ashes to form looser fabrics than a typical silty sand and contributed to the measured high void ratios, low maximum dry unit weights, and high friction angles. Overall, we hypothesize that the relative amounts of inorganic versus organic constituents in our wildfire ash samples affected how the ashes formed fabrics and so affected their geotechnical properties. The role of wildfire ash in the postfire hydrological response of a catchment is not perfectly understood. Ash is a very heterogenous material whose properties are directly related to its formation environment (fuel type and accessibility, fire duration, and fire temperature, to name a few). This newly formed surface soil layer has unusual properties compared to natural soils, including low bulk densities and high porosities (sometimes up to 70% or more) in situ, but there is currently not enough information on ash properties in the literature to fully explain why. This study addresses this gap by providing physical, chemical, and geotechnical information about wildfire ashes. This is one of the first studies to specifically test wildfire ash maximum density, Atterberg limits, and shear strength. It provides geotechnical data to the community as well as information about ash chemical and physical properties. We hope that this study not only supplements the current literature on postwildfire landscapes but also informs researchers, engineers, and policy makers about how the formation environment of ash can influence its engineering behavior, such as strength, compressibility, and permeability.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleWildfire Ash Composition and Engineering Behavior
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume150
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11683
    journal fristpage04024067-1
    journal lastpage04024067-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian